Skip to main content

Fieldwork

According to the ESPAD handbook, data collection should be performed during spring. With the exception of three countries, data were collected between February and June 2015, with a majority of data-collection exercises conducted in the March-May period (Table G). For pragmatic reasons, the Belgian survey was carried out half a year in advance, in October-December 2014, while Georgia and the Netherlands collected data during the late autumn of 2015.

The ESPAD guidelines contain no rules as to whether teachers or research assistants should be responsible for data collection in the classrooms. Instead, the recommendation was to use the category of survey leaders whom the students trusted the most. In about half of the countries, teachers or other school staff administered the data collection, while research assistants did so in the other half (Table G).

Table G. Characteristics of the data collection. ESPAD 2015

Download XLS  
CountryData collection periodData collection modeSurvey leaderAnonymity preserverData entry
Albania16 April-29 MayPen and paperResearch assistantJoint envelopeManual
AustriaMarch-June 2015Web surveyTeacherAnonymous passwordsCASI
Belgium (Flanders)October-December 2014 (February 2015)Pen and paper aSchool staffIndividual envelopesManual a
Bulgaria5-26 JunePen and paperResearch assistantIndividual envelopesManual
Croatia3-27 MarchPen and paperSchool staffIndividual envelopesManual
Cyprus20-24 AprilPen and paperTeacherJoint envelopeManual
Czech Republic1-29 JunePen and paperResearch assistantIndividual envelopesOptical scanner
Denmark17 March-27 MayPen and paperTeacherIndividual envelopesManual
EstoniaFebruary-AprilPen and paperResearch assistantIndividual envelopesManual
Faroes2 March-17 AprilPen and paperResearch assistantJoint boxManual
Finland16 March-3 AprilPen and paperTeacherIndividual envelopesOptical scanner
FYR Macedonia bMarch-MayPen and paperResearch assistantJoint envelopeManual
FranceApril-MayPen and paperResearch assistantStickers/joint envelopeOptical scanner
Georgia26 October-25 NovemberPen and paperResearch assistantIndividual envelopesManual
GreeceMarch-AprilPen and paperResearch assistantJoint envelopeOptical scanner
Hungary1-31 MarchPen and paperResearch assistantJoint envelopeManual
IcelandFebruary-MayPen and paperTeacherIndividual envelopesOptical scanner
IrelandMayPen and paperTeacherIndividual envelopesManual
ItalyMarch-AprilPen and paperTeacherIndividual envelopesOptical scanner
Latvia7 April-31 MayWeb surveyTeacher/school staffNot applicableCASI
LiechtensteinMarch-AprilWeb surveyResearch assistantNot applicableCASI
Lithuania16-25 MarchPen and paperSchool staffIndividual envelopesManual
Malta23 February-4 MarchPen and paperTeacher (mainly)Individual envelopesOptical scanner
Moldova21 April-19 MayPen and paperResearch assistantJoint envelopeManual
Monaco24 MarchPen and paperTeacherIndividual envelopesOptical scanner
Montenegro17 April-15 MayPen and paperResearch assistantIndividual envelopesManual
NorwayFebruary-MayPen and paperTeacherIndividual envelopesOptical scanner
Netherlands1 October-7 DecemberWeb surveyResearch assistantNot applicableCASI
PolandMay-JunePen and paperResearch assistantIndividual envelopesManual
Portugal27 April-15 MayPen and paperTeacherIndividual envelopesOptical scanner
Romania11-29 MayPen and paperResearch assistantIndividual envelopesManual
Slovakia23 March-10 AprilPen and paperResearch assistantIndividual envelopesManual
Slovenia30 March-3 AprilPen and paperSchool staffIndividual envelopesManual
Sweden9 March-27 AprilPen and paperTeacherIndividual envelopesOptical scanner
Ukraine15 May-15 JunePen and paperResearch assistantIndividual envelopesManual
a Mainly, though a few classes in the ESPAD sample did an online version.
b Official name former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

To stress the anonymity and confidentiality of the survey, the handbook recommended the use of individual envelopes for each student to put his/her questionnaire in and then seal. Individual envelopes were used in about three quarters of the countries (Table G). In the remaining countries, other measures were taken which were judged to fulfil the same purpose. Examples include the use of large class envelopes, which were sealed in front of the students, or a closed box into which the students put their forms.

In Austria, Latvia, Liechtenstein and the Netherlands no such precautionary measures were needed since the traditional data-collection mode of pen and paper had been abandoned. Instead, web surveys were performed in those four countries. This differs in relation to prior ESPAD data collections in those countries, and also differs in relation to the other countries collecting data in the traditional way in 2015. There are of course several advantages to online surveys, such as cost-effectiveness and more rapid data collection. From the ESPAD perspective, one general disadvantage could however be that the changed datacollection mode may give rise to questions of comparability.

For Latvia, the online data collection seem to have not functioned so well. Technical problems resulted in a large proportion of uncompleted questionnaires. Since students were not assigned unique individual codes, it appears that some had entered the survey several times and there were also instances noted of students that had accessed the questionnaire outside school hours. Although efforts were made to identify and remove such invalid cases, this still leaves doubts regarding the implementation of the Latvian fieldwork.